The quick answer

Good AI content support is a repeatable production process, not a folder of impressive samples. Judge it by identity consistency, usable output, correction time, permissions and fit with the destination platform. The creator should understand and approve how their image is used.

A good sample can hide a bad production process

Anyone can select the most attractive image from a large batch. That does not tell you whether the next batch will look like the same person, whether it fits your page or how many hours someone spent fixing it. When an agency sells “advanced AI,” ask to see the process behind the sample.

The useful question is not whether the agency owns an expensive tool. It is whether its workflow helps you produce appropriate content with less effort and fewer surprises. A beautiful image that needs constant corrections can be a poor business tool.

This is our quality standard, not a claim that a measured majority of agencies fail it. Compare any team—including XO—against the actual work it can show.

Start with whether the content still looks like you

Check identity across a sequence, not only a single portrait. Look at facial proportions, distinguishing features, body consistency, lighting and changes between frames. A mismatch can be obvious when two individually convincing images sit beside each other on the same page.

Then review the creative direction. Does the content fit the personality your audience already recognizes? An agency that keeps drifting toward a generic aesthetic may be producing technically polished material that weakens your brand.

Do this before discussing output volume. Ten pieces you approve and want to publish are more useful than a hundred files you would never put your name to.

Use a small, specific trial brief

A controlled trial tells you more than an unrestricted request to “make something amazing.” Agree the purpose, authorized source material, visual direction, destination and approval process first. Start with ordinary promotional material you are comfortable reviewing.

  • Request a small batch in one consistent style, rather than unrelated showpieces.
  • Include different crops or formats to reveal whether the identity holds up.
  • Ask for one deliberate revision and record how accurately it is carried out.
  • Count rejected pieces as part of production cost, not as successful output.
  • Track the time you personally spend checking and correcting the batch.

Your image is not a blank permission slip

Agree what the agency may create, where the material may be used and who approves publication. Discuss storage of source files, access by other workers and what happens to files or trained assets when the collaboration ends. Do not assume that permission for one campaign covers every future use.

AI can involve your identity as well as somebody else’s software. Ask which tools and providers handle the source material, and whether their terms fit the intended work. Never use another person’s likeness without appropriate permission.

Platform requirements differ and change. Meta’s own transparency work illustrates why an agency needs a current disclosure process, not a blanket “AI is allowed everywhere” answer. Meta’s AI transparency statement.

Measure cost per approved asset

Here is a simple illustration. A batch costs $120 in production and produces 24 files. If only six are usable, the production cost is $20 per approved asset—not $5. Add the value of the time spent briefing and reviewing before deciding whether the workflow saved anything.

You can also measure turnaround time, the proportion approved and the number of revisions. Once material is suitable for publication, measure whether it helps the actual goal: a better content schedule, meaningful visits or paid subscriptions. Attractive output and useful outcomes are separate tests.

Avoid a promise of “zero creator work.” Your source material, boundaries and approval remain part of the process even when the production tools improve.

What we mean by optional AI support

XO offers AI-assisted content and workflow support as an option within a tailored plan. It should serve your creative direction and reduce repetitive work. It is not a requirement for working with us, and it is not a promise that any particular type of synthetic content can be published on every platform.

If you are considering an agency, ask for a discussion of likeness, permissions, review time and quality control before you ask how many images it can generate. Those answers tell you much more about the service you are buying.

Common questions

How do I compare two AI content agencies?

Give them comparable briefs and assess approved output, identity consistency, revision quality, time required and total cost. A sample gallery alone is insufficient.

Does AI content mean I can stop creating entirely?

Not necessarily. Source material, creative choices, approvals and audience expectations still require your involvement.

Does XO require creators to use AI?

No. AI-assisted content is optional and discussed according to your preferences, goals and platform requirements.

Sources & further reading

XO THE AGENCY

Make your next move with XO.

Tell us about your page and the support you want. We’ll discuss a plan that fits.

Talk to XO